Category Archives: All

Config fixed…

I think I’ve nailed the configuration issue that prevented the RSS feed link from working (or the permalinks, for that matter).

Maryland Sheep & Wool 2007

I guess there were sheep. There was definitely wool πŸ™‚  And some
other interesting fibres, too.

If you want to understand more about what the Maryland Sheep and Wool Festival
is like, have a look at these pictures
to get a sense of what happens when an estimated 70,000 people (and
some number of sheep, alpaca, angora rabbits…) descend on the Howard
County Fairgrounds for each of 2 days of the annual festival.

For myself, I thoroughly enjoyed a 2-day pre-festival workshop on Aran
Sweater Design, lead by Janet Szabo
.   There’s something to
be said for spending 2 days with fibre-fiends of a similar level and
interest, focusing on fibre and design.  On day 1, sensing that we
were all a little twitchy after 3 hours of data about cables and ropes,
Janet lead us through the ultimate infinite cable — the circle:

O!

It’s magic!  (It’s in Janet’s
book
, and also in Barbara Walker’s Charted book).  On Day
2,  there was a certain amount of swatching, and a dive into a
sample project sweater:

swatch Sample

We arrived at the fairgrounds around 11am on Saturday — a little late,
by most standards.  But, there was still room in the fields for a
few more cars, so we got to enjoy a few hours of wandering through the
throngs of fibre and sheep enthusiasts.  Truly, it was
overwhelming.  In the end, I focused (if “focus” was possible!) on
stuff from small-scale outfits that I’m just not likely to encounter in
the fibre anywhere else.  And, yes, a touch is worth a thousand
words when it comes to yarn!

loot

In there, there’s a crochet (!) kit from Shelridge Farm, some wool/bamboo
sock yarn and some silk/merino from Ellen’s 1/2 Pint Farm,
as well as some laceweight silk and some silk/wool blend from Spirit Trail.  Oooh, and
some Koigu KPPPM leapt into my hands, as well.

Oh, and there might have been T-Shirts, books, and a few other
oddments, too πŸ˜‰

So, apart from enough yarn for 2 sweaters, a top, 3 pairs of socks and
a shawl, what did I get out of the experience?
Completely overwhelmed.  And I realized that yes, possibly, there
is a point at which one does not want any more yarn (this may be a
passing condition πŸ˜‰ ).   One of the things that really
struck me was the quantity of yarns in a multitude of colourways. 
That is, unlike a typical LYS setup, each booth at the fair was pretty
focused, and it stocked several skeins of any given
colourway.    This is a *major* win, as far as I’m
concerned. 

It was pretty neat to be wandering around that many people with similar
(and yet, clearly, wildly divergent) interests.  I managed to
resist the lure of all the spinning paraphernalia, though I am told I
would be a better knitter if I did spinning as well.  With 2
knitting machines craving attention in the basement, I really can’t say
I have time for spinning.  No, not even with a drop spindle! 
Though, this resistance, too, might be a passing condition.

To round out the weekend, I just about finished up a sweater project
I’ve been working on for some time.  (Pictures, soon!).   I
have a few more things to clear off the decks and then I’ll let myself
dive into some of these new finds…

Needling

I haven’t had a lot of time for machine knitting over the last few
months (something to do with having to be in the same place as the
knitting machine for a chunk of time?!), and when I have sat down at
the machine, it hasn’t been a uniformly positive experience. 

For example, I sat down the other day and cast on 166 stitches for the
back of a cardigan/jacket I started making last fall.  I’ve done
the left & right front pieces and “just” need to do the back and
sleeves.  I really didn’t get very far with it:  the carriage
practically jammed on the first knit row, and by the second, all kinds
of stitches were leaping off the needles.  Taking a closer look, I
realized that a number of needles had bent latches:  they needed
to be replaced.

How many needles?  Well, this many…

Cross purposes

How does that happen?  Well, I guess it’s sort of like learning to
drive standard — if you don’t know what you’re doing, you’re bound to
cause some wear and tear on the parts.  Every time the carriage
jams or is very stiff to run across the needle bed, it’s likely that
needles are getting bent.  I’m certainly hopeful that I’ll be
replacing fewer as time goes by and I get more experienced!

What do you do if you don’t have enough spare needles?  Well, I
finally broke down and ordered a serious whack of spare needles (50 for
each bed).  In the meantime,  I pulled some of the needles
from the left and right edges of the machine to replace the bent ones
in the middle 166.

How bent is bent?  I guess I’d ignored/been in denial about the
problem for a while.  But, finally, the seven I pulled suffered
primarily from bent latches — they would not open fully, as is the
case for the needle in the background in this next picture — the latch
is as open as it will go, but it should flatten all the way down to the
stem.  Another failure mode is that the needle gets bent sideways,
as you can see in the foreground needle below (it’s not lying flat on
the table).

FailureModes

After replacing the 7 needles, with some trepidation I cast on my 166
stitches once more, and passed the carriage cautiously (and
smoothly!)  across the needle bed…

TwentyThreeTwentyFour

Hurray!  That’s 2324 happy little stitches a-hanging from the main
bed!  And, if ever you *doubted* the fun of machine knitting,
completing a couple thousand stitches in a matter of moments will
convince you!

Probably one of the reasons for the bent needles on the machine is that
I’ve been struggling to find the right yarns to use with the standard
gauge machine.  It was (is) hard to get used to just how fine a
yarn the standard gauge machine uses.  Essentially, it’s happy
with laceweight yarn.  But, I kept doggedly trying yarns that I,
as a hand knitter, considered “fine”, and they just were too thick for
the machine.

Well, too thick for *that* machine.  Not too thick for *this* one
πŸ™‚

NewNeedles

A while back, I found this Studio SK890 on eBay.  It’s a *chunky*
gauge machine.  That means the needle pitch is 9.0mm (to the
standard machine’s 4.5mm needle pitch), and it has 110 needles on the
bed (to the standard machine’s 200). 

As I observed a while ago — knitters fall into exactly one of the
following categories:

  • have no knitting machines
  • have one knitting machine they don’t use
  • have several knitting machines that do get used πŸ™‚

At two machines, I really am just a beginner…

Guiness Socks

At long last, some knitting content!

Some time ago, I bought some Schaefer Yarn “Anne”.  I’ve now knit
up a pair of socks using the the black and tan colourway.

Anne-brown

A few meetings passed by as I worked on a pair of Feather & Fan toe-up socks, from Wendy‘s pattern, yielding:

socks ankles

I used just under half the skein to make these (small foot!). 
Unfortunately, I think I’ve decided they are about an inch too short;
survivable, but not going to be my favourite pair of socks.  I may
have to see if there’s just enough more-than-half left in the skein to
do another pair a bit longer πŸ™‚

Knit on 2mm needles, these are fairly fine socks — fine enough to wear
in leather lace-ups, which means they’ll be part of regular office wear.

Oh, and there was the question of whether I was attracted to the
colourway because of the resemblance to our cat:

guiness-yarn guiness-socks

RAW Deal

Things have been quiet on the blog front of late.  That’s partly due to the usual situation of being overrun with too many things, and also largely due to the fact that I spent 6 months wrestling with my digital photos.

For reasons that are increasingly unclear to me, I have been shooting all my Canon PowerShot Pro1 pictures in “RAW” format.  The theory is that raw pictures are more readily manipulated in post-production, and that your computer has far more hardware to apply to doing image manipulation than any microprocessor and embedded software in your camera.  The problem is that RAW formats are just that — the raw dump from your camera.  Apparently, these are highly proprietary formats and there is no particular standardization across cameras (even within a given brand of camera).  So, the reality is that not all software handles all camera raw formats equally well.

Now, to be clear — I’m not a Photographer with a capital “P”.  I like to have a camera capable of taking decent pictures (with, or more likely, without my help πŸ˜‰ ), and want the ability to play with them in post-production on the odd occasion.   But, being more of a Snapshot kind of person,  for most of my photos I would like to be able to dump the images, wave a magic software wand (read:  batch process) and have a reasonable set of  basic jpegs to show immediately.  I was perfectly happy for the first 6 months I was shooting raw.  I would dump the raw images into one directory, point GraphicConverter at the directory, do a batch process to produce jpegs from the raw files, and voila!  I had raw “originals” and decent jpegs to post here or do whatever.

And then I upgraded my version of GraphicConverter, from version 5.75 to version 5.81.  And the jpegs it was producing looked *awful*:  the colour balance was way off on any of the indoor shots (everything had a yellow tinge).

Yellow

Now, I really like GraphicConverter as my photo library management tool.   It’s simple, it doesn’t get in your way, and yet it has a lot of useful features you can optionally use.  But, I needed a reasonable way to get the picture above to look more like its intended colour balance.

NotYellow

After poking & prodding at GraphicConverter for a while, and finally concluding it wasn’t a bug or a setting that had gotten knocked out of whack during an upgrade, I started looking around for dedicated RAW conversion software that would work on my Mac, cost less than $100, produce decent basic JPEGs easily, and fit in my workflow.  PhotoShop clearly could work on my Mac, but it wasn’t clear it could meet any of the other criteria.  And it’s a very big hammer for the job.

I wound up looking at Bibble, Raw Developer, and Capture One.  (I wanted to play with Google’s Picasa, but it only runs on Windows platforms).  I grabbed about 50 of my RAW pictures and tried each of the packages.  This was actually something of an interative process — it turns out that it takes time to figure out what the possibilities are in each package, as the user interfaces are all somewhat unique, and I got better with each package as I went along.

Here’s a sample of the output JPEGs.

Bibble

Raw Developer

CaptureOne

bird-bibble bird-rawdev bird-capture1
lei-bibble lei-rawdev lei-capture1
sweater-bibble sweater-rawdev sweater-capture1

From the above, it should be clear that I completely wiped out with Bibble.  I found the resulting JPEGs were exceedingly brash, not quite right in terms of colour, and in the picture of the lei you can see bad moire patterns in the light on the wallpaper.

For me, the difference between Raw Developer and Capture One was less obvious.  In the end, I leaned towards Raw Developer because I seemed to more naturally achieve results that were credible.   The blue in the sweater is closest to real life in the Raw Developer (middle) version in the bottom row, for example.  Others (who actually know something about image manipulation πŸ™‚ ) have compared the two packages and found interesting similarities and differences, too — and no hands-down winner.

I’ve now been using Raw Developer for a while, and generally find it is living up to expectations of producing decent renditions from RAW photos, with minimal effort.  Of course, there are times one wants to stop and actually play with a photo, to take a reasonable picture and produce something powerful and sublime.  I had a look at LightZone, which has a very interesting interface based on playing with layers and masking — as one would with traditional photography.  There are further elaborations of the LightZone approach available on the Web.  But, I could not quite find that it would replace Raw Developer for me, and I think if I want to play with photos that much, I’ll have to bite the bullet and really learn PhotoShop.

Movin’ in…

Welcome to the new instantiation of the KnitBot blog! Importing content from the old blog ran afoul of some formatting issues, so I’ve simply saved it as an HTML page, here. The blog-specific links may not work, but the content should remain accessible.

Here, I’ll be working on window dressings and other ornaments (aka, look and feel) for a while yet, but I will try to post some actual *content* soon πŸ™‚

P.S., Thanks to Pete, who helped me with the original installation here (umm, 2 years ago. Yeah, I move *slowly*, but I do move πŸ˜‰ ).